Sunny Acre, LLC v. Edgar Meinhardt

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20212:21-cv-08013California758 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-8013 MWF (KESx) Date: October 18, 2021 Title Sunny Acre, LLC v. Edgar Meinhardt, et al.

Present: The Honorable: MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, United States District Judge

Rita Sanchez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT

The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the County of Ventura for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below.

“The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.’” Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great Northern R. Co. v. Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Where Congress has acted to create a right of removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v. Bank of America Corp., 672 F.3d 661, 667 (9th Cir. 2012); Gaus v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.