Monica Briseno v. Luke Charles Strode

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20212:21-cv-08187California1,127 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONICA BRISENO, Case No. CV 21-08187-FMO (RAOx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING ACTION

v. AND DENYING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT

LUKE CHARLES STRODE, et al., WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR

COSTS

Defendants. 16 17 I.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

19 In September 2021, Plaintiff Monica Briseno filed an unlawful detainer action 20 in Los Angeles County Superior Court against Defendants Luke Charles Strode and 21 DOES 1-10. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Notice of Removal”), Exh. A, at 5-10. Defendants 22 are allegedly occupants of real property owned by Plaintiff and located in Santa 23 Monica, California. Notice of Removal at 7. Plaintiff asserts that Defendants have 24 failed to comply after being served a 30-day notice to vacate and deliver up 25 possession of the property and seeks costs and damages. Id. at 8-10.

27 For clarity, the Court refers to the page numbers inserted by the Electronic Case Filing system. Defendant Luke Charles Strode…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.