Federal Trade Commission v. QYK Brands LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20218:20-cv-01431California4,902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Case No. 8:20-cv-01431-JLS-KES

11 Plaintiff, Magistrate Judge: Hon. Karen E. Scott v.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

13 QYK BRANDS LLC d/b/a Glowyy; et ORDER al,

15 Defendants

18 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

20 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 21 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 22 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 23 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 24 following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does 25 not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 26 protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 27 information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable 28 that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.