Cervantes Nieto v. HD Supply Management, Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20212:21-cv-08201California892 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. CV 21-8201-DMG (KSx) Date October 20, 2021
Title Cervantes Nieto v. HD Supply Management, Inc., et al. Page 1 of
Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO STATE COURT FOR LACK OF
SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
On October 15, 2021, Defendant HD Supply Management, Inc. (“HD Supply”) filed a notice of removal on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Notice of Removal (“NOR”) [Doc. # 1]. The removal statute—28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)—is strictly construed against removal jurisdiction, and if there is any doubt as to the right of removal in the first instance, federal jurisdiction must be rejected. Geographic Expeditions, Inc. v. Estate of Lhotka ex rel. Lhotka, 599 F.3d 1102, 1106-07 (9th Cir. 2010) (citing Gaus…