Albert Ibarra v. SMG Holdings Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20212:21-cv-06959California2,615 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CV 21-6959-RSWL-MAR x ALBERT IBARRA and DUSTIN

WALL,

ORDER re: MOTION TO REMAND 13 [7, 10] Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 SMG HOLDINGS INC. dba GREEK THEATRE, a Delaware Corporation; UTP PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Utah 18 Corporation; and Does 1 to 100, Defendants. 21 Currently before the Court is the Motion to Remand (the “Motion”) [7, 10] filed by Plaintiffs Albert Ibarra and Dustin Wall (“Plaintiffs”). Having reviewed all papers submitted pertaining to this Motion, the Court NOW FINDS AND RULES AS FOLLOWS: the Court DENIES the Motion. 28 I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs are residents of Los Angeles,

California. SAC ¶ 3. Defendant SMG is a corporation, incorporated under the laws of Delaware with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania. Notice of Removal (“Removal”) ¶ 12, ECF No. 1. Defendant UTP is also a corporation, incorporated under the laws of Utah with its principal place of business in Utah. Id. ¶ 13. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants “jointly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.