Roger D. Silk v. Baron Bond

O

JS-

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 ROGER D. SILK, Case № 2:21-cv-03977-ODW (JPRx)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS [30]

14 BARON BOND and HOWARD B. MILLER, in their capacity as Personal 15 Representatives of the Estate of Frank Bond,

Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Roger Silk initiated this action against the representatives of the late 20 Frank Bond’s Estate seeking payment for tax and estate planning services Silk 21 provided Bond during Bond’s lifetime. (Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 1.) Defendants Baron 22 Bond and Howard B. Miller are personal representatives of the estate of Frank Bond 23 and move to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction. 24 (Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 30.) The matter is fully briefed. (Opp’n, ECF 25 No. 36; Reply, ECF No. 37.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS 26 Defendants’ Motion.1

28 1 After carefully considering the…