Antonio Fernando Melara v. Elaine Duke

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20215:17-cv-02275California4,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – EASTERN DIVISION 10 ANTONIO FERNANDO MELARA, Case No. EDCV 17-2275 JGB (SPx)

12 Petitioner, v. FINDINGS OF FACT AND ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary of the CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Department of Homeland Security, et al., Respondents.

17 18

20

23 24 25

27 This case was tried to the Court without a jury on July 16, 2021. Before trial, both Petitioner and Respondent United States filed proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Local Rule 52-1. (“Pr’s PFOF,” Dkt. No. 71; “US PFOF,” Dkt. No. 72.) 5 At trial, the Court ordered supplemental briefing on the Petitioner’s burden 6 of proof. Petitioner submitted his brief on the subject on July 27, 2021. (“Pr’s 7 Supp. Br.,” Dkt. No. 79.) Respondent United States submitted its brief on July 30, 8 2021. (“U.S. Supp. Br.,” Dkt. No. 80.) The United States also submitted a 9 closing brief on August 9, 2021, supported by proposed findings of fact and 10 conclusions of law. (“US Br.,” Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.