Gregory Bernard Lacy v. J. A. Lizarraga
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20215:19-cv-00583California429 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GREGORY BERNARD LACY, Case No. 5:19-cv-00583-DDP (KES)
Petitioner,
v. ORDER ACCE PTING FINDINGS AND
J.A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
Respondent. STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other
records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those
portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Respondent objects that, with respect to Counts 4, 5, and 6, Petitioner has not shown prejudice from the constitutional errors described in the Report and Recommendation. (See Dkt. 39 at 5, 14.) On collateral review, however, Respondent has the burden to show harmlessness. See Mays v. Clark, 807 F.3d 968, 980…