Angelica Limcaco v. Steve Wynn

Jo-d9 □□ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANGELICA LIMCACO, RowecMehe IS Plaintiff, ORDER re: Defendants’ v. Motions to Dismiss First STEVE WYNN, et al., él ol. top [S7, 98,

Defendants. Currently before the Court are five motions to 19] dismiss Plaintiff Angelica Limcaco’s (“Plaintiff” or “Limcaco”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed by 21] Defendants Wynn Resorts, Ltd. (“Wynn Resorts”) and Matthew Maddox (“Maddox”) [57], Defendant Steve Wynn 23} (“Wynn”) [58], Defendant Kimmarie Sinatra (“Sinatra”) [61], Defendant Barbara Buckley (“Buckley”) [91], and Defendant ML Strategies, LLC (“ML Strategies”) [108]. Having reviewed all papers submitted pertaining to the Motions, the Court NOW FINDS AND RULES AS FOLLOWS: the

Court GRANTS with prejudice Wynn Resorts and…