Adam Ghadiri v. Every Day Happy Day Outlet
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20218:21-cv-01751California525 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. SACV 21-01751-CJC(DFMx) Date: November 1, 2021
Title: ADAM GHADIRI V. EVERY DAY HAPPY DAY OUTLET ET AL.
PRESENT:
HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY
THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S UNRUH ACT CLAIM AND RELATED
STATE LAW CLAIM
On October 21, 2021, Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri filed this action alleging Defendants violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). (Dkt. 1 [Complaint, hereinafter “Compl.”].) Plaintiff also alleges that Defendants were negligent under California state law. (Id.) Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief under the ADA, statutory damages under the Unruh Act, and damages for his negligence claim. (Id. at 5–6 [Prayer for Relief].) Plaintiff contends…