Warden

Paul Hupp v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20215:21-cv-01670California3,051 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 5:21-cv-1670-RSWL (MAR) Date: November 2, 2021 Title: Present: The Honorable: MARGO A. ROCCONI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ERICA BUSTOS N/A

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A N/A

Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY FIRST AMENDED

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE SUMMARILY DISMISSED AS

UNTIMELY

On September 23, 2021, Petitioner Paul Hupp (“Petitioner”), proceeding pro se, constructively filed1 a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“section 2254”) challenging his January 30, 2019 conviction. ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1 at 1. On October 12, 2021, the Court ordered Petitioner to file a First Amended Petition. Dkt. 3.

On October 22, 2021, Petitioner constructively filed: a First Amended Petition (“FAP”), Dkt. 6; a Reply to the Court’s October 12, 2021 Minute Order, Dkt. 7; and a “Motion for Extension of Time to File for 90 days to exhaust State Habeas Corpus Action” (“Motion”) requesting a “90- day…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.