RG Abrams Insurance v. The Law Office of C.R. Abrams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RG ABRAMS INSURANCE, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-00194-FLA (MAAx) Plaintiffs,

ORDER ADJUDICATING

v. DEFENDANTS TO BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT ORDERS,

IMPOSING SANCTIONS, AND

THE LAW OFFICES OF C.R.

SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE ABRAMS, et al., [DKTS. 229, 237] Defendants.

18 19 RULING Before the court are two Orders to Show Cause Why Defendants Should Not Be Held in Contempt for Violation of Court Orders (collectively, the “OSCs”). Dkt. 229, 237. The court held a hearing on the OSCs on November 5, 2021 (the “Hearing”). For the reasons stated herein, the court:  FINDS by clear and convincing evidence and ADJUDGES Defendants Christopher R. Abrams (“Abrams”), Sarah Rinelli (“Rinelli”), Jack R. Mills (“Mills”), Cynthia Wooten (“Wooten”), and Robin Armstrong 28 …