United States v. Reliance Medical Systems, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20212:14-cv-06979California4,102 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

28 The government’s First Amended Complaint alleges that beginning in 2007, Defendants used Physician-Owned Distributorships (“PODs”)to present false or fraudulent claims to Medicare. (First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) ¶¶ 76, 310, 315.) As alleged in the FAC, Defendants operated a scheme through which physician-investors in, or employees of, spinal implant distribution companies, such as Defendants Apex Medical Technologies, LLC (“Apex”) and Kronos Spinal Technologies, LLC (“Kronos”), were paid a portion of the distribution companies’ profits from spinal implant device sales.1 (See, e.g., FAC ¶ 96.) In short, the government alleges that spinal fusion surgeries related to this scheme were tainted by kickbacks to the doctors choosing the spinal implant products, and were, in some cases, not medically necessary. (FAC ¶¶ 3-4.) This scheme, the government alleges, violated the Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”), 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b), and, by extension, the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, insofar as the tainted surgeries led to false or fraudulent claims to Medicare. The FAC also alleges that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.