Sharam Saba v. Maria Sinutko

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20212:21-cv-08711California1,091 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1

JS -

3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAHRAM SABA, Case No. CV 21-08711-MWF (RAO)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING ACTION

v. AND DENYING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT

MARIA SINUTKO, et al., WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR

COSTS

Defendants. 16 17 I.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

19 On May 18, 2021, Plaintiff Shahram Saba filed an unlawful detainer action in 20 Los Angeles County Superior Court against Defendants Maria Sinutko and DOES 1- 21 10. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Notice of Removal”) at 8-12. Defendants are allegedly 22 occupants of real property owned by Plaintiff and located in Sherman Oaks, 23 California. Notice of Removal at 9. Plaintiff asserts that Defendants have failed to 24 comply after being served a 30-day notice to vacate and deliver up possession of the 25 property and seeks costs and damages. Id.

27 For clarity and because the pages appear to have been filed out of order, the Court refers to the page numbers inserted by the Electronic Case Filing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.