Daniel Dealba v. R.C. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20212:20-cv-02366California674 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION DANIEL DEALBA, ) No. CV 20-2366-PA (AGR) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ) ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WARDEN R.C. JOHNSON, et al., ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE ) TO PROSECUTE Defendants. ) ) ) ) 17 For the reasons discussed below, the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause, if 18 there be any, in writing on or before November 24, 2021, why this action should not be 19 dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order. 20 A. Procedural History 21 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a First Amended 22 Complaint (“FAC”). Plaintiff sued the following defendants for civil rights violations: 23 (1) Warden R.C. Johnson; (2) Corrections Officer Karanikolas; and (3) Board of Parole 24 Commissioners R. Grounds, B. Roberts, D. Long (incorrectly sued as Lang) and A. 25 Soares. (Dkt. No. 6.) 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.