Grace Valencerina v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20212:21-cv-07016California358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-7016 MRW Date November 10, 2021 Title Valencerina v. Costco

Present: Hon. Michael R. Wilner, U.S. Magistrate Judge Veronica Piper CS 11/10/2021 Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: Sam Nordean Ara Baghdassarian Proceedings: ORDER DENYING REMAND MOTION

1. For the reasons stated during the video hearing today, the Court denies without prejudice Plaintiff's motion to remand this action. (Docket # 11.) The unrebutted declaration of Defendant’s attorney — buttressed by the agreed-upon disavowal of an intended remand motion — convince the Court that Plaintiffs attorney did not satisfy the pre-filing meet-and-confer requirements of Local Rule 7. (Docket # 9 at 5; # 15 at 2;

L.R. 7-10.)

2. The Court declines at present to take up the substance of the defense’s contentions regarding the adequacy of the Doe defendant pleading in the complaint or the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.