Kristina Bain Golem v. Standard Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20212:21-cv-06947California2,747 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

Golem is an individual residing in the State of California. Dkt. 1, Ex. 1 (Compl.) ¶ 1. Standard is an Oregon corporation with its principal place of business in Portland, Oregon. Id. ¶ 2. The City of Los Angeles is located in the County of Los Angeles, California. Id. ¶ 3. Standard issued a group accidental death and dismemberment policy (the Policy) to the City, covering City employees who elected and paid for the coverage. Id. ¶ 5. Employees who were covered by the Policy were provided with a certificate listing the terms and conditions

1 The unopposed requests for judicial notice are granted. of the Policy. Id. ¶ 6. Golem’s late husband, Adam Golem (the Decedent), was covered by the Policy, which provided him with $500,000 in accidental death and dismemberment insurance. Id. ¶¶ 5, 7-8. The Policy issued to the Decedent provided in part that Standard would pay benefits if he or his dependent “have an accident” resulting in a loss while insured under the Policy. Id. ¶ 8. The Policy defined loss as “loss of life, hand, foot, sight, speech, hearing in both ears, thumb and index finger of the same hand, coma, and Uniplegia, Quadriplegia, Hemiplegia, or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.