Rocio Duarte v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20212:21-cv-01907California4,705 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California

11 ROCIO DUARTE, an individual and on Case № 2:21-cv-01907-ODW (AFMx) behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

Plaintiffs, MOTION TO COMPEL v. ARBITRATION [18]

15 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, 16 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a federally chartered bank,

Defendant. 19 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Rocio Duarte is suing her former employer, Defendant JPMorgan Chase 22 Bank, National Association (“Chase”) for violations of various provisions of the 23 wage-and-hour provisions of the California Labor Code. Before the Court is Chase’s 24 Motion to Compel Arbitration. (Mot. Compel Arbitration (“Mot.”), ECF No. 18.) For 25 the reasons that follow, Chase’s Motion is GRANTED.1 26

28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motions, the Court deems the matters appropriate for decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.