Isabel Ramos v. AT and T Mobility Services LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20218:20-cv-01477California2,207 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

On August 14, 2019, Plaintiff Isabel Ramos filed an action1 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles against Defendants AT&T Mobility Wireless Operational Holdings, LLC, AT&T Mobility Services LLC, and Does 1 through 10 (collectively “AT&T”). (Ex. A to Notice of Removal, Doc. 1, at ECF 15- 16.) The complaint seeks civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”), California Labor Code §§ 2698 et seq. stemming from AT&T’s failure to pay for all hours worked (including minimum wages, straight time wages, and overtime

1 This action is referred to as the “PAGA action” or Ramos’s “PAGA claims.” _____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: SACV 20-01477-JLS (KESx) Date: November 16, 2021 Title: Isabel Ramos v. AT and T Mobility Services LLC et al wages), failure to provide meal periods, failure to authorize and permit rest periods, failure to maintain accurate records of hours worked and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.