Eric Cleveland v. Chun Ja Ka

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20212:21-cv-06147California560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-6147 MWF (GJSx) Date: November 16, 2021 Title: Eric Cleveland v. Chun Ja Ka, et al. Present: The Honorable MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. District Judge

Deputy Clerk: Court Reporter: Rita Sanchez Not Reported

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None Present None Present

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

On July 30, 2021, Plaintiff Eric Cleveland commenced this action against Defendant Chun Ja Ka. (Complaint (Docket No. 1)). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), Plaintiff must have served the Complaint by October 28, 2021. On October 14, 2021, the Court issued an Order directing Plaintiff to show cause (“OSC”), by no later than October 28, 2021, why the action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Docket No. 15). The Court indicated that “[I]f the Proof of Service requires Defendant’s future response or ADA Application, and if Defendant does not timely file such a Response or ADA Application, Plaintiff must file an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.