Omar Luna v. Moorpark-Studio City Limited Partnership

Bad Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20212:21-cv-05697California569 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-5697 MWF (MARx) Date: November 17, 2021 Title: Omar Luna v. Moorpark-Studio City Limited Partnership, et al. Present: The Honorable MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. District Judge

Deputy Clerk: Court Reporter: Rita Sanchez Not Reported

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None Present None Present

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

On July 14, 2021, Plaintiff Omar Luna commenced this action against Defendant Moorpark-Studio City Limited Partnership. (Complaint (Docket No. 1)). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), Plaintiff must have served the Complaint by October 12, 2021. On September 28, 2021, the Court issued an Order directing Plaintiff to show cause (“OSC”), by no later than October 12, 2021, why the action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Docket No. 13). The Court indicated that “[I]f the Proof of Service requires Defendant’s future response or ADA Application, and if Defendant does not timely file such a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.