Terrence King v. Robert Burton
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20215:21-cv-00088California248 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRANCE KING, Case No. 5:21-cv-00088-JAK-PD
Petitioner,
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
v.
AND ADOPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF
ROBERT BURTON, Warden, UNITED STATE Respondent. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND
DENYING CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY
19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the 20 records on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate 21 Judge (“Report”), Petitioner’s Objections to the Report, and the Supplemental 22 Statement of Decision. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those 23 portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the 24 Report and the Supplemental Statement of Decision and adopts them as its 25 own findings and conclusions. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and the Supplemental 28 …