Andrew S. Kindle v. L.A.P.D Newton Division

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20212:21-cv-06252California1,133 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW S. KINDLE, Case No. 2:21-cv-06252-RGK-SHK

12 Plaintiff, v.

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

L.A.P.D. NEWTON DIVISION,

15 Defendant.

17 For the following reasons, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND On August 3, 2021, Plaintiff Andrew Kindle (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), filed a complaint (“Complaint” or “Compl.”) against L.A.P.D. Newton Division (“LAPD” or “Defendant”) alleging violations of Plaintiff’s Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Electronic Case Filing Number (“ECF No.”) 1, Compl. On August 13, 2021, the Court issued an Order Dismissing the Complaint with Leave to Amend (“ODLA”). ECF No. 6, ODLA. In the ODLA, Plaintiff was ordered to file a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) by September 3, 2021 if Plaintiff wished to Plaintiff failed to timely file a FAC as ordered in the ODLA. On September 15, 2021, Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.