George Gutenberg v. Move, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
GEORGE GUTENBERG, Case No. 2:21-cv-02382-ODW (AFMx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING
v. M OVE, INC., MOTION TO DISMISS [30]
15 Defendant.
16 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Defendant Move Inc.’s (“Move”) Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“Motion” and “FAC,” respectively) filed by Plaintiff George Gutenberg. (Mot. to Dismiss FAC (“Mot.”), ECF No. 30.) The Motion is fully briefed. (See Mot.; Opp’n to Mot. (“Opp’n”), ECF No. 33; Reply ISO Mot. (“Reply”), ECF No. 34.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Move’s Motion.1 24 25 26
1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. II. BACKGROUND2 Gutenberg is a professional photographer who specializes in the fields of Architecture and Interior Design. (FAC…