Fausto Bustos v. Royal Bank of Canada

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20212:21-cv-04879California5,544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Julian Burns King (Bar No. 298617) julian@kingsiegel.com 2 Elliot J. Siegel (Bar No. 312272) margaret@kingsiegel.com

KING & SIEGEL LLP

4 724 South Spring Street, Suite 214 Los Angeles, California 90014 tel: (213) 465-4802 6 fax: (213) 289-2815

LAW OFFICE OF LINCOLN W. ELLIS

8 LINCOLN ELLIS (Bar No. 283657) lincoln.lawyer.ca@gmail.com 292 S. La Cienega Boulevard, Suite 207 10 Beverly Hills, California 90211 Telephone: (213) 207-6692 Facsimile: (855) 701-5136

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP

14 MARTA M. FERNANDEZ (Bar No. 120540) mfernandez@jmbm.com 15 VINCE FARHAT (Bar No. 183794) VFarhat@jmbm.com 16 BRIANNA FRAZIER EARLEY (Bar No. 297354) BFrazierEarley@jmbm.com 17 1900 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor Los Angeles, California 90067-4308 18 Telephone: (310) 203-8080 Facsimile: (310) 203-0567

Attorneys for Defendants Royal Bank of 20 Canada and City National Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Fausto Bustos, an individual, Case No. 2:21-cv-04879-JAK-(GJSx) Plaintiff, vs. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.