Austin Saenz v. Ralph Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20215:20-cv-02542California1,337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 AUSTIN SAENZ, Case No. 5:20-cv-02542-MCS (SHK)

Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING CASE RALPH DIAZ, et al.,

15 Defendants.

17 For the following reasons, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND On October 13, 2020, Plaintiff Austin Saenz (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro per and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging various violations of his constitutional rights (“Complaint”). Electronic Case Filing Number (“ECF No.”) 1, Compl. After screening the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, on February 8, 2021, the Court issued an Order Dismissing Most of The Claims in The Complaint with Leave to Amend (“ODLA”). ECF No. 15, ODLA. Plaintiff had 21 days from the ODLA, which was March 1, 2021, to file his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Id. Plaintiff was warned that if Plaintiff failed to timely file a state a claim, failure to prosecute, and/or failure to obey Court orders under Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.