Jose David Ramires v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20212:21-cv-06362California1,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3 4 5 Jose David Ramires, Case No. 2:21-cv-06362-VAP-(PVCx) Plaintiff,

v. Order DENYING Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 20) Ford Motor Company,

9 Defendant. 10 11 12 Plaintiff Jose David Ramires (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion to Remand (“Motion”) on November 1, 2021. (Doc. No. 20.) Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”) filed its Opposition on November 8, 2021 (Doc. No. 21), and Plaintiff filed his Reply on November 15, 2021 (Doc. No. 22.). The Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 7-15. After considering all papers filed in support of, and in opposition to, the Motion, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. 21 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action in the Los Angeles Superior Court on March 29, 2021, asserting two claims under California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (“Song Beverly Act” or “Act”) relating to their purchase…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.