Henry Kincy v. Josie Gastelo

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20212:20-cv-10159California5,370 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 HENRY KINCY, Case No. 2:20-cv-10159-RGK-JC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS IN v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AND DIRECTING JOSIE GASTELO, et al., PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO ORDER 14 Defendants. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION On November 3, 2020, plaintiff Henry Kincy, who is in state custody, is proceeding pro se, and has been granted leave to proceed without prepayment of filing fees (“IFP”), filed Civil Rights Complaint (“Original Complaint”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). (Docket No. 1). On March 12, 2021, the Court screened and dismissed the Original Complaint with leave to amend. (Docket No. 15). On April 5, 2021, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“First Amended Complaint” or “FAC”), which was followed by three “Supplemental Exhibit(s)” on April 22, April 23, and June 1, 2021 (collectively “Supplements,” /// /// individually “Supplement [1, 2 or 3)” or “Supp. [1, 2, or 3]”). (Docket Nos.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.