John Shaw v. Timothy Lindgren

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20212:19-cv-02700California992 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN SHAW, ) NO. CV 19-2700-DMG (AGR) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY LINDGREN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 15 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, records on file, the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the magistrate judge, and Plaintiff’s objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Report. Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Request Court to Create Record of Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.” (Dkt. No. 56.) Plaintiff lists various procedures, including Plaintiff’s right to a record of evidence presented, to call witnesses at trial, to know opposing evidence, to cross examine adverse witnesses, and to have an unbiased…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.