Joscelyn Ramos v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20212:21-cv-07382California1,871 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSCELYN RAMOS et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-07382-MCS-AFM 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER REMANDING CASE

v.

14 FCA US LLC et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiffs Joscelyn Ramos and Karla Henriquez question the Court’s subject- matter jurisdiction over this matter. (Joint Rule 26(f) Report 3, ECF No. 12.) The Court ordered the parties to brief whether exercise of diversity jurisdiction is appropriate given the Court’s doubts about the amount in controversy. (Order Requiring Briefing, ECF No. 14.) Defendant FCA US LLC submitted a brief; Plaintiffs did not. (Def.’s Br., ECF No. 18.) I. BACKGROUND This is a case brought under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (“SBA”). Plaintiffs leased a 2020 Jeep Wrangler (the “Vehicle”) in November 2019. The Vehicle exhibited defects. Defendant was unable to timely rectify the defects and refused to replace the Vehicle or provide restitution. The Complaint seeks damages, replacement or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.