Orlando Garcia v. Guadalupe Alcocer

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20212:20-cv-08419California1,971 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3 4 5 Orlando Garcia, Case No. 2:20-cv-08419-VAP-(JEMx) Plaintiff,

7 v. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Guadalupe Alcocer et al.,

9 Defendants. 10 11 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Orlando Garcia (“Garcia”), who requires a wheelchair for mobility, filed this action against Defendants Digital Currency Services, Inc. (“DCS”) and Guadalupe Alcocer (“Alcocer”) (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging violations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act on September 15, 2020. (Doc. No. 1.) Garcia alleges that DCS’s check cashing store failed to maintain a lowered transaction counter. (Id.) The Court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Garcia’s California Unruh Civil Rights Act claim on September 18, 2020. (Doc. No. 12.) Garcia now seeks injunctive relief only under the ADA. (Doc. No. 1.) 23 The Court held a one-day bench trial in this case on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.