Rafael D. Miranda v. Kent Thiry
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 RAFAEL D. MIRANDA, Case № 2:20-cv-05527-ODW (KESx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
v.
DAVITA’S MOTION TO DISMISS
14 KENT THIRY, et al. [56] AND DISMISSING REMAINING DEFENDANTS Defendants.
16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Rafael Miranda is suing Defendants Kent Thiry, DaVita, Inc., and 19 HealthCare Partners, Inc., alleging Defendants violated the Defend Trade Secrets Act, 20 18 U.S.C. § 1836, and asserting related state law claims. (First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), 21 ECF No. 53.) DaVita moves to dismiss Miranda’s Complaint under Federal Rule of 22 Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (Mot. Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 56.) For the 23 reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED.1 24 25 26
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. II. …