Leonardo Magallon v. Bureau of Prisons

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20212:21-cv-01540California2,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 LEONARDO MAGALLON, Case No. 2:21-cv-1540-VAP (MAR) Petitioner, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DISMISSING CASE

v. BUREAU OF PRISONS, ET AL., Defendant(s). 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION On February 4, 2021, Plaintiff Leonardo Magallon (“Plaintiff”) constructively filed1 a pro se Civil Rights Complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics (“Bivens”), 403 U.S. 388 (1971). ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1. On March 12, 2021, the Court issued an Order Dismissing the Complaint with Leave to Amend (“ODLA”), granting Plaintiff twenty (20) days to file a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. 8 at 11–12. On March 25 26 1 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se inmate gives prison authorities a pleading to mail to court, the court deems the pleading constructively “filed” on the date it is signed. Roberts v. Marshall, 627 F.3d 768, 770 n.1 (9th Cir. 2010) (citation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.