Rune Kraft v. CRH PLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20212:21-cv-09014California2,532 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

WO 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Rune Kraft, No. CV-21-00154-PHX-SMB

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

CRH PLC, et al.,

Defendants. 14 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Rune Kraft’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), (Doc. 72), which Vulcan Defendants1 moved to strike and/or dismiss or, alternatively, to transfer to the Central District of California (“Vulcan Motion), (Doc. 80). Defendant Vadnais also moved to dismiss Kraft’s FAC, (Doc. 90), and joined, in part, the Vulcan Motion, (Doc. 91). Likewise, CRH Defendants2 filed their own motion to dismiss, (Doc. 94), and joined in the Vulcan Motion, (Doc. 87). Plaintiff filed responses to the Vulcan Motion, (Doc. 103), and to Defendant Vadnais’ Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 112). Having reviewed the parties’ briefing, the relevant case law, and extensive history underlying the instant action, the Court will grant, in part, the Vulcan Motion and will transfer this case to the Central District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.