Mario Ramos-Navas v. Merrick B. Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20215:21-cv-01596California1,732 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 MARIO RAMOS NAVAS, ) Case No. 5:21-cv-01596-TJH-JC ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, ) CONCLUSIONS, AND MERRICK B. GARLAND, et al., ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) Respondents. ) _____________________________ ) 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) and all of the records herein, including the November 1, 2021 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”), and petitioner’s objections thereto filed on November 8, 2021 (“Objections”). The Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge reflected in the Report and Recommendation, and overrules the Objections. The Court discusses petitioner’s principle objections…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.