Al Sormi v. Chad Wolf

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20218:21-cv-01661California853 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

DISCUSSION

Under the general venue provision, a civil action may be brought in: (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). For venue purposes, a “natural person” resides in the district where the person is domiciled. § 1391(c)(1). An entity that is not a person, “whether or not incorporated, shall be deemed to reside, if a defendant, in any judicial district in which such defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to the civil action in question.” § 1391(c)(2). Plaintiffs allege that a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to their claims occurred at the USCIS California Service Center, which lies in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.