Carol L. Gonzales v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20212:20-cv-03519California378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROL L. GONZALES, Case No. 2:20-CV-03519-JGB (MAA)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED; 2. Defendant Amadou Kante’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. DENIED on the issue of Heck v. Humphrey, 512…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.