Robin Murdock v. McLane Suneast, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20215:21-cv-00657California2,083 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBIN MURDOCK, Case No. 5:21-cv-00657-JWH (SPx)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND [ECF

v. No. 14]

MCLANE/SUNEAST, INC., a Texas corporation, and DOES 1 through 100

Defendants.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiff Robin Murdock to remand this case to San Bernardino County Superior Court. The Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without a hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. After considering the papers filed in support and in opposition,2 the Court orders that the Motion is DENIED, for the reasons set forth herein. I. BACKGROUND Murdock was employed by Defendant McLane/Sunset East, Inc. (“MSE”) as a non-exempt hourly employee in California. Murdock filed this labor dispute against MSE in San Bernardino County Superior Court on December 10, 2020. On February 25, 2021, Murdock filed and served her First 11 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.