George Jones v. Arnulfo Estrada

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20212:21-cv-03417California3,309 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

3

7 United States District Court Central District of California

11 GEORGE JONES, Case No. 2:21-cv-03417-ODW (ASx) Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v.

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

14 ARNULFO ESTRADA, et al., APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF Defendants. DEFAULT JUDGMENT [23] 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff George Jones applies for default judgment against Defendants Arnulfo 19 Estrada and Rose Estrade for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) 20 at the Mariscos Agua Verde Restaurant in Wilmington, California. (Appl. Default J. 21 (“Appl.”), ECF No. 23.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN 22 PART and DENIES IN PART Jones’s Application.1 II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On April 21, 2021, Jones filed a Complaint alleging the following facts. (Compl., 25 ECF No. 1.) 26

28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in support of the Application, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.