Melissa Mae Lachappelle v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20215:20-cv-01621California1,181 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 MELISSA M. L., Case No. 5:20-cv-01621-CJC (AFM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has considered both Plaintiff’s original objections and her supplemental objections, as well as the Commissioner’s reply to those objections, and has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. With the exception of the following, Plaintiff’s objections do not warrant discussion as they are properly addressed in the Report. Plaintiff objects that the Report fails to “include” important medical records. (See ECF 33 at 2-3.) Judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision, however, does not require…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.