Marcos Miguel Rangel v. California Rehabilation Center

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCOS MIGUEL RANGEL, Case No. 5:21-cv-00466-DMG-AFM

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

CALIFORNIA REHABILITATION

JUDGE

CENTER, et al., Defendants. 17 Pursuant to U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge and has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The Court also denies Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel because he has failed to show a likelihood of success on his claims or extraordinary circumstances. See, e.g., Agyeman v. Corrs. Corp. of America, 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir. 2004) (decision to appoint counsel is within “the sound discretion of the trial court and is granted only in exceptional circumstances”)…