Aram Adzhikosyan v. AT&T Corp.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 ARAM ADZHIKOSYAN, individually Case № 2:21-CV-05997-ODW (MRWx) and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO REMAND [23] AND
DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
14 AT&T CORP. et al., TO COMPEL ARBITRATION [24]
15 Defendants.
16 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Aram Adzhikosyan brings this putative class action against Defendants 20 AT&T Corporation and DIRECTV, LLC alleging Defendants violated California 21 privacy laws. (See Notice of Removal (“NOR”) Ex. A (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1-1.) 22 Adzhikosyan moves to remand the action to the California Superior Court. (Mot. 23 Remand, ECF No. 23.) Defendants move to compel Adzhikosyan to arbitrate his 24 individual claims. (Mot. Compel, ECF No. 24.) For the reasons discussed below, the 25 Court DENIES both Motions.1 26
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motions, the Court deemed the matters appropriate for…