Wixen Music UK Ltd. v. Transparence Entertainment Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20212:21-cv-02663California6,465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 WIXEN MUSIC UK LTD., Case № 2:21-cv-02663-ODW (MRWx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v.

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

14 TRANSPARENCE ENTERTAINMENT MOTION TO DISMISS [16] GROUP INC., et al.,

Defendants.

17 I. INTRODUCTION On March 26, 2021, Plaintiff Wixen Music UK brought this action against 20 Defendants Transparence Entertainment Group, Inc. (“TEG”), TEG officers Dennis 21 Dreith and Shari Hoffman, and former Wixen employee Tania Oliveira, primarily 22 alleging Defendants misappropriated its trade secrets. (Compl. 1, ECF No. 1.) 23 Defendants now move to dismiss this action for lack of personal jurisdiction, forum 24 non conveniens, and failure to state a claim. (Mot. Dismiss (“Mot.” or “Motion”), 25 ECF No. 16.) The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ 26 Motion.1

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.