Roselia Tello v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20212:21-cv-09689California1,175 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 21-9689 PA (PVC) Date December 21, 2021 Title Roselia Tello v. Target Corporation, et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER

Before the Court is a Notice of Removal filed by defendant Target Corporation (“Target”). (Notice of Removal, Docket No. 1.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that Target has not satisfied the requirements of diversity jurisdiction, and therefore remands the case back to Los Angeles Superior Court - Central District, case number 21STCV40124. “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having subject matter jurisdiction only over matters authorized by the Constitution and Congress.” See, e.g., Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.