Lourdes Toman v. Jerry Glomboske

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20218:20-cv-00046California8,744 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LOURDES TOMAN; Case No. 8:20-cv-00046-JWH-KESx ANTONIO PAREDES; and ALAN CASTRO,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

Plaintiffs, ORDER REGARDING CROSS

MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF Nos. 79 & 83] FULLERTON POLICE

DEPARTMENT;

FULLERTON POLICE OFFICERS

DAVIS CRABTREE (#1467),

RICHARD HERRERA (#1260),

MICHAEL MCCASKILL (#1449),

DAVID MACSHANE (#1274), KEVIN PEDROSA, and DANIEL PEREZ (#1547), all sued in their individual capacities; and DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendants.

22 23 24 25 26 27 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are two motions:  the motion of Defendants City of Fullerton (the “City”), Davis Crabtree, Richard Herrera, Michael McCaskill, David Macshane, Kevin Pedrosa, and Daniel Perez (collectively, the “FPD Officers”; together with the City, the “City Defendants”) for partial summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.