James Constant v. Schorr Law

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES CONSTANT, Case No. 2:21-cv-08608 JFW (KES)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

v.

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

SCHORR LAW, STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the

records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. 6 [“R&R”].) The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections (Dkt. 10) have been made. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. In his Objections, Plaintiff contends that “the Complaint can be amended and refiled under the Bivens doctrine.” (Dkt. 10 at 2.) However, just as “a private lawyer representing a client in the lawyer’s traditional adversarial role is not considered a state actor for purposes of § 1983” (R&R at 2)…