Burlingham

(PS) Young v. Burlingham

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20222:22-cv-00053California381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL CHRISTOPHER YOUNG, No. 2:22-cv-00053 TLN CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER and FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

STEVEN RICHARD BURLINGHAM, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c). On January 12, 2022, the undersigned issued an order to show cause no later than February 14, 2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff was advised that failure to allege a proper basis for jurisdiction would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not shown cause why this action should not be dismissed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of these recommendations, IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that all pleading, discovery, and motion practice in this action are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.