Pfeiffer

(PC) Martinez v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 20221:22-cv-00126California2,430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICARDO MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-00126-HBK Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

v. DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER

C. PFEIFFER; F. HERRERA, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

Defendants. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD (Doc. No. 3)

ORDER TO ASSIGN TO DISTRICT JUDGE

18 Plaintiff Ricardo Martinez, a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on July 15, 2020. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP motion”) at that time. (Doc. No. 3). On July 23, 2020, the Northern District entered an order transferring the action to this court. (Doc. No. 4). However, for unknown reasons, the case was not transferred to this court until January 31, 2022. (Doc. No. 5). For the reasons discussed below, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.