Brown

Brown v. County of Solano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 20222:21-cv-01045California1,391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Eliesa Rene Brown, No. 2:21-cv-01045-KJM-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. County of Solano, et. al., 1S Defendants. 16 Defendant Fairfield Family Health Services moves for judgment on the pleadings. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff Eliesa Brown does not oppose the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted and plaintiff's claims against Fairfield Family Health Services are 20 dismissed without leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND Ms. Brown’s action is for medical malpractice. See generally Compl., ECF No. 1. Generally, Ms. Brown alleges a nurse practitioner breached the standard of care by failing to treat 24 her chronic pulmonary obstructive disease. /d. J] 22-27. Ms. Brown also alleges the County of Solano “owned, operated, controlled, managed, funded, and supervised the Fairfield Family Health Services, a family healthcare clinic facility . .. where the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.