Sherman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ADAM SHARPE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00711-DAD-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN

PART, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

v.

MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER;

C. CRYER, et al., GRANTING MOTION TO APPOINT PRO

BONO COUNSEL AND APPOINTING

Defendants. LIMITED PURPOSE COUNSEL

(ECF Nos. 92, 94) Plaintiff Adam Sharpe is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s claims that Defendants C. Cryer, J. Lewis, and S. Gates were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order (ECF No. 92) and Plaintiff’s motion to appoint pro bono counsel (ECF No. 94). For the reasons given, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order and will…